|
NOTE: A paper describing this research was published in
the 7 May 2004 issue of Biology Letters, a journal published by the Royal
Society in the United Kingdom.
Scientists Discover Where Snakes Lived When They
Evolved into Limbless Creatures
30
January 2004 --The mystery of where Earth's first snakes lived
as they were evolving into limbless creatures from their lizard ancestors
has intrigued scientists for centuries. Now, the first study ever to analyze
genes from all the living families of lizards has revealed that snakes
made their debut on the land, not in the ocean. The discovery resolves
a long-smoldering debate among biologists about whether snakes had a terrestrial
or a marine origin roughly 150 million years ago--a debate rekindled recently
by controversial research in favor of the marine hypothesis.
In
a paper to be published in the 7 May 2004 issue of the Royal Society journal
Biology Letters, Nicolas Vidal, a postdoctoral fellow, and S. Blair Hedges,
a professor of biology at Penn State, describe how they put the two theories
to the test. They collected the largest genetic data set for snakes and
lizards ever used to address this question. Their collection includes
two genes from 64 species representing all 19 families of living lizards
and 17 of the 25 families of living snakes.
Genetic
material from some of the lizards was difficult to obtain because some
species live only on certain small islands or in remote parts of the world.
"We felt it was important to analyze genes from all the lizard groups
because almost every lizard family has been suggested as being the one
most closely related to snakes. If we had failed to include genes from
even one of the lizard families, we could have missed getting the right
answer," Hedges explains.
"For the marine hypothesis to be correct, snakes must be the closest
relative of the only lizards known to have lived in the ocean when snakes
evolved--the giant, extinct mosasaur lizards," Vidal says. "While
we can't analyze the genes of the extinct mosasaurs, we can use the genes
of their closest living cousins, monitor lizards like the giant Komodo
Dragon," he explains.
The
team analyzed gene sequences from each of the species, using several statistical
methods to determine how the species are related. "Although these
genes have the same function in each species--and so, by definition, are
the same gene--their structure in each species is slightly different because
of mutations that have developed over time," Vidal explains. When
the genetic comparisons were complete, Vidal and Hedges had a family tree
showing the relationships of the species.
"Our results show clearly that snakes are not closely related to
monitor lizards like the giant Komodo Dragon, which are the closest
living relatives of the mosasaurs--the only known marine lizard living
at the time that snakes evolved," Vidal says. "Because all the
other lizards at that time lived on the land, our study provides strong
evidence that snakes evolved on the land, not in the ocean."
The research suggests an answer to another long-debated question: why
snakes lost their limbs. Their land-based lifestyle, including burrowing
underground at least some of the time, may be the reason. "Having
limbs is a real problem if you need to fit through small openings underground,
as anybody who has tried exploring in caves knows," Hedges says.
"Your body could fit through much smaller openings if you did not
have the wide shoulders and pelvis that support your limbs." The
researchers note that the burrowing lifestyle of many other species, including
legless lizards, is correlated with the complete loss of limbs or the
evolution of very small limbs.
This research was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Astrobiology Institute and the National Science Foundation.
[ B K K ]
PREPRINTS:
A preprint of the research paper by Vidal and Hedges is posted on the
web at http://www.journals.royalsoc.ac.uk/link.asp?id=pa6a316clj7h
CONTACT:
Barbara K. Kennedy (PIO), 814-863-4682, science@psu.edu
|